Strengthen our conclusion on theJ.G.J.Hoenderop et al.Fig. six. Cd2 sensitivity of TRPV5, TRPV6 and 3-(3-Hydroxyphenyl)propionic acid Metabolic Enzyme/Protease TRPV5D542A mono and multimers. (A ) Current oltage relationships obtained in the course of voltage ramps in nominally divalentfree extracellular solutions inside the absence and presence of two, 20, 200 and 2000 mM CdCl2 for cells transfected with (A) TRPV5555, (B) TRPV5D542A, (C) TRPV55D542A55, (D) a 5 lox Inhibitors targets mixture of TRPV5 and TRPV5D542A within a three:1 ratio, (E) a mixture of TRPV6666 and TRPV5D542A within a 1:1 ratio and (F) a mixture of TRPV666 and TRPV5D542A in a 1:1 ratio. (G ) Dose esponse curves for the impact of Cd2 measured at 00 mV. (G) Dose esponse curves for TRPV5555 and TRPV5D542A. From Hill functions ted for the information (solid curves), we obtained values for KD and nHill of 64 nM and 0.78, respectively, for TRPV5555 compared with 313 mM and 0.84 for TRPV5D542A. Note that the Cd2 sensitivity of the TRPV5555 concatemer was not signi antly diverse from that of the TRPV5 monomers (KD = 74 nM, nHill = 0.81; data not shown). (H) Dose esponse curves for TRPV55D542A55 and also the mixture of TRPV5 and TRPV5D542A. From a Hill function ted to the TRPV55D542A55 data (strong curve), we obtained values for KD and nHill of 1.0 mM and 0.77, respectively. The data for the mixture of TRPV5 and TRPV5D542A weren’t nicely ted by a single Hill function, indicating a population of channels with distinct Cd2 sensitivities. (I) Dose esponse curves for TRPV6666 and for mixtures of TRPV5D542A with TRPV6666 and TRPV666, respectively. From a Hill function ted towards the TRPV6666 information, values for KD and nHill of 163 nM and 1.05, respectively, have been obtained. Comparable values had been obtained for TRPV666 (KD = 157 nM, nHill = 0.93) and for the TRPV6 monomer (KD = 261 nM, nHill = 1.05). The dose esponse curve for the mixture of TRPV6666 and TRPV5D542A was well described by the weighted sum in the Hill functions for TRPV6666 and TRPV5D542A (strong curve). In contrast, the dose esponse curve for the mixture of TRPV666 and TRPV5D542A was poorly ted by the weighted sum with the Hill functions for TRPV6666 and TRPV5D542A (dotted line).tetrameric stoichiometry in the channel. Wildtype TRPV5 and TRPV6 display voltagedependent opening from the channel upon hyperpolarization, and deactivation upon depolarization, which is illustrated for TRPV5555 in Figure 7B. The apparent open probability from the channel as a function of voltage, which was determined as the normalized inward existing upon stepping to 00 mV from distinctive test potentials, did not differ signi antly amongst TRPV5555, TRPV666, TRPV6666 and monomeric TRPV5 or TRPV6 constructs (Figure 7G; information not shown). This voltage dependence, which will depend on intracellular Mg2 (Voets et al., 2001), is abolished in the TRPV5D542A mutant (Figure 7C and G). Interestingly, the effect of this mutation on voltagedependent gating appears to be dominant, considering that mutating only a single subunit within a tetrameric TRPV5 construct (TRPV55D542A55) resulted in voltageindependent currents (Figure 7D and H). Likewise, coexpression with the TRPV666 construct with TRPV5D542A led to voltageindependent currents, consistent with formation of a TRPV666TRPV5D542A tetrameric channel (Figure 7E and H). In contrast, voltagedependent gating was reduced, but not abolished, in cells coexpressing TRPV6666 or TRPV5555 with TRPV5D542A, indicating formation of separate voltagedependent TRPV6666 (or TRPV5555) channels and voltageindependent tetrameric TRPV5D542A channels (Figure 7F and H). Taken together, th.
